What is the typical sequence for addressing solvable problems in Gottman therapy?

What is the typical sequence for addressing solvable problems in Gottman therapy?

• A. Define the problem, propose solutions, evaluate, pick, implement, test results, adjust.
• B. Implement a solution without discussion and observe results.
• C. Wait for avoidance to let it fade away.
• D. Blame the partner and refuse to repair.

Answer: (A)

In Gottman therapy, solvable problems are handled through a structured, collaborative problem-solving cycle. The process starts by clearly defining the issue so both partners share an accurate, common understanding. Then you brainstorm possible solutions together, rather than locking into one idea too quickly. After generating options, you evaluate them to weigh pros and cons and select the best path to try. Once a solution is chosen, you implement it and monitor the results to see whether it reduces the problem. If needed, you adjust the approach and try again. This sequence—define, propose, evaluate, pick, implement, test results, adjust—keeps the focus on concrete actions and mutual repair, which is why it aligns with Gottman’s approach to solvable problems. Why the other paths don’t fit: solving through unilateral action misses the collaborative, repair-focused stance Gottman encourages; waiting for avoidance to fade reflects avoidance rather than deliberate problem-solving; blaming and refusing to repair undermines trust and productive communication, which Gottman therapy aims to reduce.

In Gottman therapy, solvable problems are handled through a structured, collaborative problem-solving cycle. The process starts by clearly defining the issue so both partners share an accurate, common understanding. Then you brainstorm possible solutions together, rather than locking into one idea too quickly. After generating options, you evaluate them to weigh pros and cons and select the best path to try. Once a solution is chosen, you implement it and monitor the results to see whether it reduces the problem. If needed, you adjust the approach and try again. This sequence—define, propose, evaluate, pick, implement, test results, adjust—keeps the focus on concrete actions and mutual repair, which is why it aligns with Gottman’s approach to solvable problems.

Why the other paths don’t fit: solving through unilateral action misses the collaborative, repair-focused stance Gottman encourages; waiting for avoidance to fade reflects avoidance rather than deliberate problem-solving; blaming and refusing to repair undermines trust and productive communication, which Gottman therapy aims to reduce.